LIBERTY COVERLET ca 1841

The blue side, where the wool yarn is showing the design, left,
has much more degradation than the linen field side, right.

Our client brought MPF Conservation (hereafter called MPFC) this linen and wool pocket weave blanket to be conserved: Kate was the conservator.

One side is dark blue wool field, the other is the undyed linen field; the contrasting sides can be seen above.  The word “LIBERTY” was woven so that it could be read on each side, that is, it is backwards every other word, indicating the blanket was once reversible.

HISTORY: FROM THE FAMILY

MPFC was given a page copied from history notes from my client’s family.  This is from that copy.  We are interested in the history of the pieces we conserve, and pass this bit on to you.  (Signature of weaver shown below left.)

“Before my grandmother’s death, my mother, Eliza Quinn, had married my father, Barzilla Harrison.  The wedding was at my grandmother’s house near Savannah, Ohio, in march 1841, and I have in my possession a coverlet bearing this date.  The materials mother had taken to the weavers just before the wedding as it was to be part of her home furnishings.  She had spun the wool and the pattern was of a pine tree, blue wool and white linen.

The weaver had placed his name, date and location as follows: “J. McClellan, Ashland, Ohio, 1841.”  I am pleased to have it.  (Note: This coverlet had been woven in two parts and later divided and half given to Rosella and half to Gladys.)

My father was a public school teacher and the family lived in a number of places until father finally bought a farm in Holmes County, Ohio, I think near Killbuck.  My mother never liked that location, the community was not so prosperous nor the soil so fertile as in Northern Ohio.  But like a good soldier, she carried on.  The farm was rented while my father taught.  Sometimes his school was so far away he could not get home often. 

On January 28 1842 their first child was born, Marion Minerva.  In September 1843 a son, James Quinn was born and in March 1845 another son, John Westley.  He died four years later and on July 16, 1850 their third son, Francis Asbury was born.  In 1852, Susan Elnora was born but she died a year later of bloody flux, while our mother was ill with the same disease.  Seven years later on April 9, 1859, Mary Melissa, was born… and a year later our family moved to Cambridge, Illinois.”

YARNS: WOOL AND LINEN

The linen yarn is quite brittle in many areas.  The blue side shows much more degradation than the linen field side, because the linen yarn, undyed, disintegrated more quickly than the dyed blue wool yarn.  Hereafter we will refer to the yarns simply by their color, “linen” for the natural linen yarn, and “blue” for the blue wool yarn.

GOALS

The coverlet was cut in half; the two quarter sides of the
linen field side are shown above before treatment.

MPFC was asked to repair the coverlet so that our client could gift the textile to her relatives.  We were to spend a set number of hours on the project.  Our goal was to work on the linen field side shown above:

  1. Repairing the long edge with the rolled edging along one side, shown right.
  2. Repairing/stabilizing the long cut edge.
  3. The two “side” edges, examples shown right, would be repaired.
    1. Stabilizing and repairing the edging would both stop degradation and allow the textile to be gently handled with less worry about further damage.
  4. In instances where the pocket weave was damaged in a manner shown top right, where you could clearly see both layers, we were to tack the layers so that they read and were stable, rather than simply cutting the edges to match up (see video below).
  5. In all instances we would retain as much of the original blanket as possible.
  6. We were to repair large holes and the rip along one side, shown right (see video below).
  7. We also tacked down loose linen yarns where possible.  This was especially true when Kate was repairing an area and had leftover thread.  She then repaired nearby small pulls and such.
  8. In the beginning we were thinking to infill some holes, but a dye issue in the states stopped that goal (see notes below).
  9. Stitching was to be performed by hand.
  10. To hand-wash the textile after reparation.

A project like this, with reparations ranging from loose threads to large holes 1-inch or more in diameter, could go on endlessly.  In museums it is likely that all reparations would be completed, however, that is rarely the case with private clients who have reasonable budgets.  After discussion, our client offered a monetary figure to work with and this determined our scope of work.

After carefully pondering how to approach the project, MPFC decided to focus on the side which had the natural linen field, because the design on the blue side (in linen yarn) is so degraded visually that it is almost unreadable in some areas and would be unsatisfactory for the family to display.

Kate’s setup for the project, the lid holding the threads and needles and scissors.
She folded the coverlet continually to keep it safe during repairs.
When she stepped away, the project is covered with the sheet above.

MATERIALS

Thread used was Gütermann 100% cotton thread CA02776 in colors 927 and 6250.  We chose a slightly darker linen colored thread because it actually disappears into the field better than a lighter, “perfect” match due to the shininess of the thread versus the worn linen yarn.

Needles, for the most part, were  Sharps size #9 and #10, and CS Osborne and Co lampshade 2″ curved needles, gauge 21, with a round point, #741.

Regarding infilling holes, Kate spent two days (on our nickle) searching linen/cotton/wool yarns in the USA and had no luck finding a color in an appropriate yarn that came close to matching the blue yarn.  (Image of Woolery’s Euroflax Linen Yarn colors shown left.)

Finally we spoke with a local yarn company that also specializes in dyes.  Kate sent the colors she had found next to the color of the blue, and asked if the yarn could be dyed to “match.”  It did not have to be a perfect match just closer than what was available, the 3-4 colors of linen, linen/cotton blends, or wool blends that appeared to be appropriate for coverlet.  I was told that in the USA the dye companies have limited the available dye colors, and because of the issues in dying they do not mix color, so this is why in the USA the blues, for instance are limited.

We had to move on with what we had available.

CLEANING DYE TEST

We began by performing a dye run test, to ensure that at the end we could in fact wash the coverlet by hand.  This is important as the coverlet would always be fragile, even after our reparation, so could not be sent out by our client to be dry cleaned.  Dry cleaning, besides being chemical, is also usually tumbled during the wash cycle and this would never be appropriate for this piece.  Hand-washing in gentle conservation soap would be our goal, and we wanted to know early if the dyes were stable or would run.

To that end, we saturated a corner of the coverlet and then watched over several minutes to see if the blue dyes ran; we are happy to report they did not, and proceeded with the reparations.

REPARATION

Kate began with the edges; after the edges were stabilized, she moved to the interior.

Occasionally Kate came across a previous repair, usually obvious in that it was hand-stitched as the one shown right.  These were removed and properly repaired.

Stitches used were typically the blanket stitch, running stitch, and cross stitch in variations.

We are jumping ahead to a video
taken after the project was completed and the coverlet cleaned:
Kate showed where, other than the rip (shown later) the bulk of the extreme
damage occurred along what we assume is the fold line.   It is a bit of a warning
to consider how items are stored, because this probably simply rubbed against
a texture (wall?), and abrasion of the fibers occurred along this line.

Kate has over 400 images of the process.  Rather than show with ALL of them, we will show a few process images of select areas.

REPARATION: EDGES

Reparation began at this long edge, with the proper rolled edge along the long side. 

Before and after of this area.
Note the cleaner linen color inside the rolled edge shown left.

Above, the steps in reparation of the corner edge with the rolled bottom.  Large loose yarns were trimmed, stitching of the two layers of the pocket weave were repaired using mostly the blanket stitch.

Left, the completed corner with the two layers trimmed and stitched, and loose areas stabilized.

 

Above, a second repair along the rolled edge, where pinning was
crucial in having the rolled edges stitched properly.

Above, brittle linen yarn was stabilized and trimmed along the pine tree trunk using the blanket stitch; the side edge was stabilized using the blanket stitch..

The signature shown (backwards) on the corner.  Besides the edge, linen yarns inside the signature were also stabilized using cross stitches and blanket stitches.

Above and below, a six inch rip along the long cut side was the most difficult repair.

Kate was happy she saved the six-inch rip along the long cut side for after she had performed a lot of stitch work on the coverlet.  The goal was to not just repair the rip, but to have the rip lay flat and to have the pattern recognizable.

The gross tattered yarns were trimmed in preparation.

White basting thread loosely stitched the rip into place while Kate laid the edges as she wanted them.  A running stitch and blanket stitch, in both the linen thread and the blue thread, secured the rip; as the true stitching was performed, the white running stitch was removed.  Finally, an additional running stitch was used to secure linen threads along the right at the top of the rip.

Below, the rip before and after reparation.

REPARATION: INTERIOR

Several interior motifs had damage.  We noticed it was along one line, and surmised it was along a fold line, where it possibly rubbed on items in shelves.

One of the ways Kate prioritized the treatment was if a fingertip could be inserted under a lifting linen area.  Those areas were all repaired, and then adjacent areas might be if there was leftover thread on the needle..

Above, before and after the top half
of a floral motif; right, the entire
motif shown after treatment.

First the large hole was edged with
the blanket stitch in blue.

Linen was stitched into place in
several areas using both the blanket
stitch and a cross stitch occasionally.

in the process another small hole
in the blue was found and repaired.

While several areas of this large motif were repaired,
the large top floral was shown in detail above.

This motif was extremely damaged, shown before and after, above.  The linen which defined the center flower was lifting all around.

Below, details of everything that was repaired.

Several of the petal edges could be lifted and a fingertip inserted underneath; these were stitched.  Several small. holes were discovered in the blue field. The threads were trimmed, and the holes stitched.  The linen along the sides of the petals were stabilized using the blanket stitch.

The flower after treatment, above; all the linen areas were
secured and several small holes were also repaired.

The left-facing floral motif surrounding the central flower was trimmed and tacked into place where it was lifting; above.  Below, the same on the right-facing side.

The central flower with the floral motifs that flanked each side after treatment.

The top floral motif and flanking sides with extreme losses after treatment;
unfortunately the large blue areas were not original to the coverlet.

Below, one of the damaged star patterns which are between the large floral patterns.

Before treatment, several holes were discovered in the blue field alongside lifting linen threads.

Four holes 1/8”-1/2” were treated. The largest hole was surrounded with the blanket stitch in a starburst pattern.  Smaller holes located and were treated by weaving across the hole and around it with a running stitch to stabilize.

Finally linen threads were stabilized and the area was finished.

HAND-WASHING

The coverlet was gently folded and soaked in cold water for a half-hour with Orvas paste, above left.  From time to time gentle agitation was performed by refolding (easy to do in a full tub of soapy water) and pushing gently on the folded coverlet.

The coverlet was rinsed a dozen times until the water was clear with no trace of soap, above right.  It was then set on a stack of thick towels to drain for an hour.

Finally it was set on a clean set of tables to air dry over two days.  We did not add heat to the mix; we wanted it to dry gently.

COMPLETION

Video of the Liberty Coverlet after treatment and dried from washing.
Oops, coverlet, not quilt in the video…
I apologize for the shaky video; I am not fond of standing on the tall ladder.

I am very happy with the results of the treatment.  Even with the obstacles to reweaving due to dyes, the goal of the treatment was to stabilize the areas, repair where possible, restitch, and clean.  The coverlet can now be safely gently handled by family without doing immediate damage due to ripping holes.  As you can see in images below, the colors became brighter, and even the stains left many years (and of unknown origin) were lightened or removed altogether

Above, the halves as they roughly match the after images below.
Unfortunately I did not take the exact same images.
Still, the same lighting shows how much cleaner the coverlet became, and the
lightening of the dark stains on the right facing images from top to bottom.

As stated in a video at the beginning of this post, the bulk of the serious damage is along the area shown below, which we surmise is where the coverlet was folded for many years, and in that time rubbed against something that abraded the fibers.

Below, several examples of entire motifs after treatment!

   

 dkatiepowell  @  aol.com / mitchellrpowell  @  aol.com
(So sorry, but we got too much spam — please copy and remove the spaces!)
503.970.2509 / 541.531.2383
©MPF Conservation.  May be printed for your own use.
Notify us if you repost, and use our url + copyright as reference.

Posted in antiques, conservation techniques, decorative motifs, French Furniture, Interim Report, painted furniture, painted objects, preservation, process, reparation, restoration techniques, upholstery, wooden objects | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Suzi Piegols’ Textile

Above, the piece after conservation.

I had the privilege to
repair and conserve a portion
of this unusual textile artwork
created by Suzi Piegols,
a well-known Oregon textile artist,
shown left with
a quilted piece of her own.

I wish I could have treated
the entire piece,
but time was limited.

GENERAL NOTES

Note 1: The videos shown in the blog are very casual, intended for my client only
to allow her to see what I was working on daily.  We don’t often do this, but
as this is a very sentimental piece – her mother’s – we wanted to engage in this manner.  Highly technical terms, such as “this” and “that” were used, with a lot of pointing!
It is unlike what you read in the blog or on the website, partly because
I needed to keep them under a minute for easy sharing and adding definitions
such as what hand carded pencil roving meant would only add to the time.
I decided to share many with you as they are informative,
plus shows you behind the scenes how we work with our clients!

Note 2: Color is subjective in the images, as they were chosen for clarity.
The color above is closest to the actual piece. 

Note 3:  I apologize in advance for blurry photos.
Imaging white weaving is difficult, and I would have had to stop for each image
and place an object like a needle into the photo in order for the camera
to have something to focus on — and it became too much!
Most thumbnails below expand to much larger images: Click on them!

ASSESSMENT AND CONTEMPLATION

Above, the piece before conservation, front and back.

I spent a day studying the piece, and deciding how to approach it.  I was tasked to repair only about ten inches of the RF weaving (right-facing from the front which becomes the left on the back).  My goal, besides conserving this treasure, was to reuse all the original wool if possible.

Much of the wool was not necessarily yarn, and especially the loosely spun wool that created the large hole that needed reparation.  This was wool hand carded pencil roving which could not be easily handled or rewoven, shown right, because it pulled apart easily.  I knew I might not be able to reuse this spun wool, and so my first goal was already in jeopardy.

While on the subject, at the end of the project I packed the roving carefully
in acid free tissue and labeled it to give to the client.  While I could not
use it right now, there might come a time when this could be used.  In any event,
nothing original and reusable is ever thrown away; it is kept with the piece.

I made the decision to use bright white warp rather than coming close to what the warp looks like now, shown left.

Mitchell voiced the concern that the natural linen might darken too much over time, whereas the bright white would age to be the color the original warp is now.

In the end 24 warp lines were replaced, seven more than we originally planned, because I found more breaks hidden in intact weft.

The broken warp, while still in place, had lost tension.  This compromised the weft.  It no longer aligned properly, sagged, and in a few instances had unraveled.  From the front, above and right, before treatment.

Note the heavy ring, right, which pulled on an area of roving and warp toward the top, and would be corrected during treatment.

Above right, an area that I also repaired though it was not part of the contract, discussed later.  I could not leave it!

SO MANY ISSUES

Looking at the upper backside, shown
above and right, it is easy to see how
much the weft has sagged along the warp lines which are broken at the bottom,
shown below.

I had already pulled the weft up and down the original warp line where possible,  trying to find out how much of the warp line was embedded with weft.

Again, the embedding of weft wool into
the original warp lines made the
project more difficult.

Left, the bottom half of the backside of the textile, and at the bottom of that image you can see the hole, which is shown in detail in the above two rows.  In details images 1, 3 and 4 above you can see the dangling roving and the hole.

In image 2 note the original warp which had remained woven, and is “white”, versus the broken warp which had been stripped of its weft and turned brown and brittle.

Image 6 shows an area which looks intact, but I found broken warp embedded in the weft, and this led to more replaced warp lines.

The video above discussed the missing roving (which I mistakenly call yarn in the video),
and how I will approach the reweaving (replacing) of the warp.

Above, technically I started the first warp line (discussed below) in the video above, but had to do it over again and so this video really discusses issues in the weaving, and belongs here.

FIRST WARP LINE

I used a #8 crochet hook to make sense out of the roving, shown above.  When I began I didn’t anchor my warp line but let it dangle.  I wanted to experiment with the first weaving of the warp, and this allowed me to pull it easily.  Soon I used metal pushpins to use an anchoring devices top and bottom, shown in the EIGHTH WARP LINE,  below.

Along the way I tied a couple of knots, shown right, in the roving (although that happens to look like the warp line is in the knot it is behind it, an illusion).

In most cases, I placed the new warp line in next to the old warp line, then removed the old warp line.  The first line was nerve wracking, and made difficult because I had to fight with the embedded wool to allow the new warp to go through the weft rows.

Occasionally I found a four-wrap weft at the edge, shown in image #4 above; I never understood why.

In the “crocheted” or “knitted” weft, really just a stitch that looks like it, shown left, I found cut threads in the 4-ply yarn.  I barely managed to tie them off to keep them from unraveling; to secure them I used Gütermann cotton thread to knot them in place, shown left.

Above, the video shows my first warp line installed.
In it I discuss the bunching of the weft yarns, which I will even out later when all
the warp lines are replaced, and show the knot in relation to the long line.  Note: what I call weft yarn at the end of the video is the wool hand carded pencil roving.

SECOND WARP LINE

The second day of weaving I felt a bit more comfortable and was able to take
more images of my progress on the second warp line.  Scroll through the
images and you will see my commentary.

In the third through the sixth warp lines, I began to move faster than one row
in a day.  I did not record each line until the seventh, just oddities.  Had I documented all the lines it which would have tripled my time on the project.

SEVENTH WARP LINE: THE RING

Earlier I noticed Suzi often let the weft weave over several warp lines,
or would let one warp stay free, and assumed it was a design technique.
I finally understood that one instance of the anomalies had to do with when she encountered the rings, because she wanted the warp lines, which were strong,
to wrap onto the rings a few times, and this did not allow the weft to move
freely around that line.  Suzi skipped that warp when weaving her weft for a couple of rows above and below, which allowed the weft to move freely around the ring.

In the seventh warp line I encountered a ring, shown above, and
did as she would have done, and I could see this clearly in the original weave.
I wrapped the seventh warp around the ring several times, but did not
weave the warp into the weft above or below for about a half inch.

In the seventh warp I first engaged the jute rope.

EIGHTH WARP LINE

I recorded the eighth line because it cut through the leather/fur and engaged the jute, shown above and right.

In image #2 above, you can see the fur/skin, and it cracked in two places.  When weaving the warp back through the weft and around the fur, I pulled the new warp line through the fur next to the skin, or let it sit behind the fur/skin.  This was a deviation from Suzi’s weaving, but I had to be inventive to save the leather from cracking.

I had enough warp lines in to begin to move the weft lines to balance the weaving overall, shown above.  I was confident at the end I can balance the whole RF-side!

I began tying my warp lines with a loop, and placing them top and bottom around metal push pins, shown above and left, knowing that at the end Mitchell would use upholstery techniques and tacks to secure them top and bottom.

Suzi had a pattern of weaving two warp lines together in the roving, shown left.

It might have been a design decision, but it also could have been done for a different stability reason around the roving

LAST FEW COURSES, WRAPPED WARP,
AND A NEW WEAVING PLAN

As I moved along the bottom of the RF-side, I ran into difficulties and had to find a way to work to resolve certain items as I found them instead of completing a whole course.
One issue was I was afraid I’d get a course done and then find a buried
original warp line — that is how hard it was to see what I was doing.

Further, I found some broken warp lines so we increased
the number of warps I was going to replace.

The video above discusses working through the mess of original warp lines embedded
with wool yarns , and also having almost no way to find them, as the tags left
by breaks were sometimes buried in the weft.

At the sixteenth warp line the weaving became very tricky.  The weft was partially intact, and wonky (highly technical term), shown above left.  I had trouble differentiating which warp was the one I needed to thread next, and then because from time to time Suzi skipped weft lines, I lost the warp lines a few times trying to make sense out of the weaving.  I thought not having weft was hard, but having to deal with the wonky weaving intact was harder.  Finally I decided to concentrate on the warp lines and take
them up to the jute weft, which was the easiest to see, shown above right.
This took a long day of 9 hours to get them to this point, and was tense.

Be sure to click on the image to the right above
to see the entire image, as it is not square.

The next day  I took the lines up to where most of the warp lines were wrapped with an original toasty colored yarn, shown right.

I unwrapped the original warp lines, shown above, another time consuming task as some of the weft yarn embedded into the warp line.  Suzi’s wrapped warp also was part of a weaving of a bright soft white weft yarn, shown above right, and they were so tightly bound into their own corkscrew shape they caught on everything.

The original wrapped warp lines to be replaced ended where new warp lines were intended. I almost had to work with just one of the next wrapped lines, but didn’t.

Suzi had knotted the wrap yarn at the top, shown above left, and then used
sewing thread to further secure it, possibly because she had to trim it close
or it would have been seen dangling through the open weave.

I unwrapped two lengths of yarn, one that wrapped the first three wrapped warp lines, and the other which wrapped the next five wrapped warp lines.  Both had tight corkscrew curls.

I washed the yarn to remove the tight corkscrew curls that were created by being wrapped for many years.

After I thoroughly washed it, it still required gently working it with my hands to make
the yarn relax.  I pinned it to the wall and allowed it to dry, shown above right.

I finished adding the rest of the 24 warp lines, shown left.

SECURE WARP LINES
AND CORNER ANGLES

Now it was time to secure the new 24 warp lines
Mitchell used Gurney Quality 6 oz upholstery tacks, wrapping each new line
top and bottom, then tapping the tack into place, shown above.
Note that Mitchell places the tacks in a step pattern to ensure the wood is not stressed
all along one line, which could eventually cause a split in the frame.

The original steel angle braces had been designated to return to their original corners, shown top left.

They were backed with Mesheshe Self Adhesive Felt Sheets, shown top center.

It is our policy to conserve all nail and tack holes on a project by filling the holes with hard wooden picks, shown top right during treatment.  This ensures holes cannot continue to degrade and cause issues in the overall structural strength.

After everything cured, the angles were installed in their original holes with their original screws, shown right. 

WRAPPED THE WARPS

The new secured warp lines were wrapped with their original yarn, cleaned and relaxed from the tight corkscrew folds, shown completed left.

The shorter lines were quite difficult, perhaps in part due to running out of wrap yarn.  The next five wraps were easier, and I was able to vary the wrap direction as Suzi did.  The top was stapled, and the bottom was tied off and stitched as necessary.  I was unable to wrap it as tightly as Suzi did originally.

Following are three videos which describe and discuss that process!  Please excuse my stumbling dialogue in the rest of the videos; I was on a muscle relaxer as I hurt my back.

When I discuss Suzi being able to tug and pull the wrap taut,
it was because she was, I assume, tugging upward.

I discuss the process of washing and manipulating the original wrap,
preparing it for the re-wrap of new warp lines.

Shows the difference in the wrap yarn before it was wrapped (in a tag off another
warp line not replaced) versus the yarn I washed and manipulated.

ROVING

Originally my client had agreed to allow us to substitute a mix of creamy yarns
that matched the original woolen hand carded pencil roving well both in
color and intent, shown above center.  I was thinking that I would
simply fill in the arched hole shown above far left.

A new idea came to me just before I started, which was to gently spread and space
the original roving and then weave the new yarns into the gaps.
This worked out so much better than adding yarns alone in that arched hole!

Below, a video about the process.

CLEAN UP

I tidied up my work on the back.
Far left above, I braided the leftover new warp lines, then stapled the braid
in the corner and once along the side.  This might allow someone if necessary to
adjust the new warp lines if necessary in future.

I tied all long bits of Suzi’s leftover yarn which was dangling, to protect it from harm and to save for anyone in future who might need it.  A simple bow, easily untied, was used.

OUTSIDE OUR CONTRACT

I was compelled to repair two items that were outside our contract.  Remember the before treatment image (right) with the bundle of yarns which we placed back in their loop just to keep them out of the way?
I wanted to make it look proper!

I removed the original long staple, shown above left and center.  Two small nails were used to replace the piece as it was originally.

Below, this should be properly repaired by replacing the warp line, but as an interim to keep the line from lufting and possibly catching on something, I stapled the line into a taut position.  Later that staple can be removed and the warp line replaced.

THIS AND THAT

When the textile was delivered for conservation there was a large wooden sliver on the left-facing bottom of the frame.
The last day it suddenly fell off, as if begging for a repair.  Above, Mitchell glued the 7-inch piece back into place.

I thoroughly vacuumed dust from the
textile front and back through a filter.  However, the jute rope had sloughed bits of dark rusty rope which did not vacuum up, shown left.  They create a rusty cast on the creamy white wool.

OUR WORK ON SUZI’S PIEGOLS’
TEXTILE IS COMPLETED

Above, the front of Suzi Piegol’s textile before, left, and after, right.
In these images the work performed is on the right-facing side.

Below, the back, which exposes the damage, before, left, and after, right;
shown from the back it is as if it is the left-facing side.

Below, details of the right-facing side after treatment, from top to bottom.

Repositioning the weft yarns up and down the new warp lines looks good,
details above.  I am so happy with the way the hole filled, last image above.

 dkatiepowell  @aol.com / mitchellrpowell  @aol.com
(So sorry, but we got too much spam — please copy and remove the spaces to email us!)
503.970.2509 / 541.531.2383
©MPF Conservation.  May be printed for your own use.
Notify us if you repost any part of this blog, and use our url + copyright in reference.

Posted in antiques, art, conservation techniques, decorative motifs, Interim Report, preservation, process, reparation, restoration techniques, textiles, upholstery | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Conservation of Margaret Rose’s Sampler Ca 1832

Above, the top of the sampler with Margaret Rose’s name and location at the time of the
creation of the sampler.  On either end you can see that originally the piece was
intended to be hung on a rod, loop shown below right, but this was not going to be practical for the preservation of the sampler in future.

Margaret Rose was family member, though placement in her family tree is still being ascertained.  The best of the family’s information is that she was actually born Margaret Roos in 1814, possibly in France, and then moved to Canada in an area once called Upper Canada, in the town of Waterloo.  The name was probably anglicized at some point by the family.

She was also the weaver, embroiderer and artist who created this sampler in 1832.

GOALS

Our client’s goals were to

  • stabilize the entire piece so imminent danger for more damage was removed
  • remove the folds,
  • stabilize the many rips
  • not to restore the piece to the way it might have looked had it never been damaged, and simply aged gracefully intact.

Our entire treatment was reversible.

Finally, she wanted to display it in her home, so it was to be mounted in some manner and she asked for our input on how to best do this.

Note: Throughout the blog you will see images in these two tones.
The reality is the color is somewhere in between.  We take images with and without flashes and choose for the best informative photograph.

CONDITION

The sampler was folded and stored for many years.  While the storage did not damage the actual piece, embedded folds that were difficult to remove, given the piece was not washed by submersion.

After the various repairs, we tried our best to iron the folds out, and had some success, but there are still areas where a slight fold can be detected (see after images at the bottom of this post).  We are hoping that over time the slight leftover folds will relax.

The threads on the face of the sampler have faded over nearly two centuries, but we have a better idea of the original colors of the stitched motifs’ threads by looking at the back of the sampler, shown right above and left below.  In the front of the motif, shown above left, it is hard to see the grey-blue, as the blueish hue is completely missing and it appears grey.  Below you can see how much blue was in that “grey” thread!  It is also hard to see the two different tones of the rose and maroon, which end up looking variegated at best, and we just assume they faded to those colors.

But in the image of the back of the stitched motif above left and directly left, you can clearly see the following colors:

  • gold,
  • cream,
  • soft brown,
  • dark brown,
  • soft blue,
  • rose,
  • maroon,
  • and possibly black or a very dark grey.

The sampler was created on single weave linen fabric, and as Margaret was a weaver, the family has attributed the woven cloth she used as one of her own making, which is entirely possible.  We understand that Margaret knew how to make this linen weaving thread from the Flax plant to the finished product!

For more information on this process, visit Wikipedia on Flax.

Part of the sampler was performed doing drawn thread work, shown in its finished state right and below.

Thoughtfully chosen linen weft threads were originally removed to create the pattern of holes, and then embroidery, mostly in the form of attached cross-stitches, decorated and accentuated this pattern.

There were several ripped areas in the linen, the largest shown right before reparation.  (We show this repair below in “TREATMENT: REPAIRS“.)

Above, examples of the front and backside of the drawn thread work with cross stitching
used to decorate it.  Note lace attached to the bottom of the sampler, shown above and below, has many detaching areas and rips which were repaired.

Lace was attached in two areas: Top of the sampler (shown at the top of blog); and bottom middle, shown above.  Threads holding the lace to the linen were detaching or missing, and large holes and rips were also present in the lace.  The top of the sampler’s lace was in good condition with no issues.

There were several previous repairs, mostly very small though noticeable.  The one on the left is an example of a large and glaring repair, done in a contrasting embroidery yarn.  I cannot believe Margaret made it, but it is quite old and no doubt was performed by a family member.

We left it as part of its history.

Note: The piece was relatively clean, and we vacuumed it thoroughly after repairs were made through a filter.  It has never been exposed to oily heat nor smoke and did not appear to have any embedded grease or smoke residue.  Further, the dyes might be fugitive so IF in future cleaning is desired, a conservator should be contacted.

MATERIALS

We used various threads over the entire sampler, largely because fading made it difficult to “match” any one thread to all of it.  Even in the body of the linen and lace, which one would think might. be even in color, the differences in the linen color, a “beige”, made it impossible to choose a best thread that would match all the variations.  To do it exactly, one would have to constantly start and stop to switch threads in a single 2-inch rip, let’s say, which is very expensive.   Instead, we choose threads that matched most closely to a given area. The first image above shows many of the threads we used.  The second one shows the 100% cotton threads we used most often:

  • Gutermann CA02776 Color 1140 beige (body background linen and lace)
  • Sulky 713-1150 / 2156 1315 CA45688 (maroon embroidery)
  • Gutermann CA02776 Color 9430 dark grey (embroidery)
  • Gutermann CA02776 Color 1001 black (embroidery)

TREATMENT: REPAIRS

LACE

Our first challenge was to stabilize the lace by repairing the rips both in the body and along the edges where the lace was attached to the sampler.  From time to time that meant crocheting the threads in a chain stitch with a #8 crochet hook, a process not photographed, because it is already hard to crochet thread and to take images when you are by yourself is next to impossible without ruining your work!

Again, our goal was not to repair/reweave the lace, a treatment we are capable of performing but is very time consuming and also drives the cost of the treatment up.  This repair was an acceptable compromise.  As with many treatments, our repairs are reversible should anyone want to do additional treatment in future.  Always remember your clients goals.

Below, three repaired areas on the lace where it attached to the linen.  I apologize in advance as some of the images were too blurry to use.

1.5-inch RIP

Working back and front, lace was attached to the linen.

Before and after, 1-inch RIP above and 3/4-inch RIP W/HOLE below.

LARGE RIP IN DRAWN THREAD

This was a complicated repair, in that it appears to be a hole needing a “simple” thread repair in the drawn thread with all manner of fraying threads, but in reality is tied into a possible previous repair (darker greyish threads along the side), and unraveling side weaving.  The “simple” thread repair (somewhat woven) that stabilized the piece (again, not a true restorative weave of linen threads) also had to be anchored top and sides in stable linen.  I am showing how I started, the breaks I took to repair adjacent issues, and the result.

The piece was stabilized onto a foam board; white copy paper allowed us to see the area during treatment.

As I began I realized that trying to repair the large hole was foolish unless I repaired the smaller damages around it first.  To that end I moved upward first, and took care of the row with the maroon embroidery and damaged drawn thread areas.  Process shown above and below with notes.

#5361 Showing damaged area; note the frayed fluffy ends of the linen thread.

#5366 Pinning and beginning weaving repair threads with the weft threads.  Usually you work with the warp threads first (vertical) but in this case, I had to start with the weft threads (horizontal).

#5367 I realized areas above in the smaller drawn thread must be repaired… #5368 Drawn thread repair begins… and I take you through that until the last image of the first smaller drawn thread repair images is posted, #5385.

A second repair to stabilize area above hole in shown above, #5387 through #5393.

I went back to adding the weft threads, and from time to time I used a simple knot to keep the threads in place, #5400.

Again a repair was needed before weaving the weft could continue.  The sides were unraveling, and this may be part of a previous repair as greyish threads were present.  #5403 I wrapped the sides to stabilize the edge, and moved to continue the weft weave but noted another previous repair in grey thread, #5413!  More wrapping of the edge, and finally the weft threads are in place in #5418.

I begin weaving the warp thread through the weft, #5421.

The maroon embroidery threads were unstable, so in #5424 I show adding maroon threads to secure embroidery within drawn thread area.  When I was complete, I left the maroon thread and needle in place in case I needed it again #5431 , and turned to woven hole again, continuing to weave the wrap threads.  As I am weaving the warp thread, it is anchored top #5433, and bottom #5440 with simple knots to keep it from being pulled or slipping, #5444.

#5436 Shows stabilization running through the maroon embroidery area.

In #5446, the weaving in completed.

Maroon threads are added, completing the repair above repaired hole, #5448 -#5452.

Repair to stabilize hole is complete, shown right.

The large hole began just below the point of the arrow.

The adjacent necessary repairs mostly happened above the point of the arrow and of course, all along the side for about 4-inches!

 

 

 

REPARATION OF THE BODY IS COMPLETE

Above, the lower lace and drawn thread before treatment.  Below, the repaired lower fifth of the sampler is completed.  It still has folds, and the ends want to curl upward, even after ironing.  (Ignore the disparity in color, which is about the flash/no flash of the camera.)

TREATMENT: ATTACHMENT

FRAME AND UNDERCLOTH

Our client chose to back Margaret’s sampler with a lovely organic, slightly green-grey hemp twill.

The face and sides of the face edges of the a sturdy 1.75-inch frame were wrapped with 7 oz hemp and cotton twill, chosen for stability, allowing the final showcover cloth to be pre-pinned along the edges prior to tack down.  This allowed for adjustments in the cross-weave of the showcover, without sacrificing its tension to the overall weave.  This ultimately protects the thinner hemp twill showcover from abrasion.

THREAD

Thread chosen for the attachment was Gutermann CA02776 Color 1140 beige, shown below with and without flash.

STITCHING

The entire piece was pinned onto the face of the stretched hemp cloth, shown right.

After centering the sampler, I started pinning in the middle line, and worked up and down on thee lines pinning the sampler in place.  The lace was pinned, top and bottom, and in the center where no line existed an imaginary line was created across the body of the sampler below the central motif.  Finally the sides were pinned.

Stitching began in the same places, working top and bottom as described above, then the edges.

The stitch appears to be a running stitch, but it is carefully stitched straight up and down, shown above and below, in order that it not pull the piece along the long stitch lines.  A knot was place at beginning and ending, and one spot in the center.

For another bit of stability, and also because the stitching along this area was a bit tattered, I chose to cross stitch over the decorative motif along the bottom using a cross stitch carefully stitched straight up and down.

I used the Sulky 713-1150 / 2156 1315 CA45688 maroon embroidery thread for the cross stitching, shown right and below.

Areas in the centr where motifs were missing were stitched at the end, shown below/

Finally, using Gutermann CA02776 Color 1140 beige, a tiny stitch was used all around the edges every 1/4-inch to secure the edges to the hemp cloth, shown left.

I tried to photograph it but it is hard as the threads blend into the linen, which is good!

AFTER

Showing after images in both flashed and no-flashed images, below.

Note:  The “wobbles” in the sizes of the linen as we move from top to bottom have an interesting story.  I originally thought Margaret cut her linen wobbly. (Sorry, Margaret.  I should have know better, whit your attention to detail.)

Instead, Margaret cut her linen precisely, but as she stitched the stitches took up the threads on the overall width to varying degrees.  The areas where almost no stitching occured is the widest width; where there are layers of many patterns of stitches the linen is pulled in, and so we get the “wobbly” edge.

 

MOTIFS

Margarets motifs are delightful. Below, I name them, though a couple still elude me — maybe you can tell what they are?

A pot with large leaves or flowering plant in it OR
it is sitting on a table and the pot is quite small.

Three flowering plants.  I believe the center one is a orchid.
What I don’t understand is why the one on the right has more space than the left. 
It may be the only mistake I found, so sorry Margaret!

One area may be Christmas or holiday decor:
A reindeer, a heart, and a red robin.
There are many hearts and a few crowns on the sampler.

In each corner, angled flowering plants in a heart-shaped pot.

Several motifs:  A cat or dog following behind a rooster;
a heart with a crown topping it; the sun or stars;
possibly these are phoenix, but definitely bird images;
and lastly flowers.

Tables with wine goblets setting on them. 
In one a small gift of a flower, and in the other, a heart.

Two tables with beverage containers on them and glasses;
small dogs or cats on either side.

Flowers, maybe tulips, coming up from planters.
Is that writing on the one on the right?

Finally, what every sampler contains, the alphabet!
Margaret Roos (Rose) placed her initials here,
and we presume the date is when she finished the sampler.

NOTE:  WordPress has decided to add the bit at the end about dkatiepowellart because it recognizes me as the author; I haven’t figured out how to remove it yet!
I have a blog about my art, and I am half of a partnership in our conservation business.

 dkatiepowell  @  aol.com / mitchellrpowell  @  aol.com
(So sorry, but we got too much spam —
please copy the email address and remove the spaces!)
503.970.2509 / 541.531.2383
©MPF Conservation.  May be printed for your own use.
Notify us if you repost, and use our url + copyright in reference.

Posted in antiques, conservation techniques, decorative motifs, preservation, process, reparation, restoration techniques, textiles | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Louis XV Polychrome Commode Ca. 1730

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Above, the commode before treatment;
note the faux “drawers” on the front which are really hiding the door.
Below, the underside of the commode.

This well loved Venetian poly-chrome commode was created in the classical Louis XV Style.  It has been in service for three centuries and weathered multiple risings of the Adriatic tides (Aqua Alta), which filled courtyards, pathways, shops and homes of the citizens of Venice before receding back to the seas traditional elevations.  The Aqua Alta left the citizens homes and furnishings with brine and water-logged decorative objects.  Survival of the citizens prized possessions depended much upon the preparedness of the owners of the objects.

To that end, this cabinet supports that theme in that its owner introduced two iron eyelets early on in the cabinets journey into the upper cabinet outside back, shown right, securing the cabinet to hooks placed in the wall behind the commode which prevented the cabinet from floating away during these periodic floods.

Demure in stature. the commode sustained splits and selective losses from contraction of its wooden substrates in its legs and lower cabinet structure which was necessary to address.  As this post will show, several areas of internal loss from dry-rot required strategic fills in order the prevent the cabinets legs from structural failure and cracks in the solid plank front door required stabilization through the introduction of internal butterfly key-locks in order to prevent the door from separating and falling from the cabinet.

The historic cabinet contained was crafted from three distinct wood species: European Beech, Birch and Pine.  All fresh wood introduced during the restoration matched the original wood species within each amended and repaired component.

Hand painted classical elements adorned the cabinet front which was typical of its period while also reflecting the Venetian decorative mindset for that period in history.  What set this piece apart from many painted French pieces of this era was the painted faux marble top which we selectively infilled within badly worn faux mineral vein impressions and badly worn gold leaf edge molding which bordered three sides of the cabinet top.

The underside of the commode
was rough hewn wood with a large
knot in the center, above, which
contrasted with the once-beautiful painted exterior.

The entire carcass had serious splits
or cracks that went nearly through
various parts of the commode,
and the ones in the door were repaired.

However, the large cracks on the sides were in our opinion not repairable.  To try to repair these on this 300-year-old cabinet would have caused more damage.  We chose, instead, to allow this “old lady” to be able to be old, shown her cracks, and make her stable and beautiful again.

The first thing we discovered about
the commode was that it leaned
(shown first image in the slideshow top
and left, with the level).
The door wanted to slam shut when opened.

We was decided not to fix the lean.

To fix it a piece of wood would have
to be placed on the bottom of the legs to
lift the left-facing side, shown right.

  This was ill advised, because we
would have to drill into the slender legs
to attach the wooden lift, and as
you will see, the legs also had splits.

The commode was hand-carved and hand-made.  Evidence of this is easily seen in the chatter marks on the back of the legs, shown left.

The door hinge is an eyelet hinge, original to the commode, shown below.

On the back at the top of the commode are two eyelets on each side, shown below.
After researching these oddities, we discovered they were commonly installed to hold pieces like this in place during the Venetian Aqua Alta.

REPARATION

We began with the door, and it needed several reparations.

REPARATION: DOOR LOCK

The lock was not operating properly.  The lock-box was hidden behind the wallpaper, which was not original to the commode but had been applied decades before.

The commode was turned on its side, and we began by removing
the wallpaper and removing the lock-box, shown above.

Because the lock-box did not work properly, Mitchell disassembled the lock-box.
He cleaned it, lubricated it, and made it operational again.

The walls of the cavity for the box were then repaired, rebuilt
and the lock was reinstalled, shown above.

REPARATION: DOOR SPLITS / KEYLOCKS

The door splits were repaired using keylocks, shown above, strategically placed to stop the door from splitting.

Six keylock mortise were carefully excised to fit the keylocks.  The keylocks were glued in place with warm hide glue.  The second to the last image shows them painted.

We decided to save the wallpaper to the best of our ability.  We lifted a good deal of ink from the shelf, final image above.

The faux drawers were separating from the door, right, and these were glued, clamped to cure, then secured from the back to ensure they stayed put.

REPARATION: LEGS

All the legs had issues, but the back legs had serious fissures that continued
up into the commode body and would eventually cause failure.

First, Mitchell created jigs to be used when gluing the repairs on the legs, above.

REPARATION: REAR LEGS

As an example, showing the rear right-facing leg reparation.
Above you can see the length of the crack,
and the knot-like fissure in the top of the leg.

Below, the reparation, including the fill for the knot,
which came close to penetrating the leg
but did not go through the painted front.

The second rear-facing leg was repaired in the
same manner, shown below during treatment.

REPARATION: FRONT LEGS

The Left-facing front leg was cracked, shown above.

The crack was repaired using gap-filling glue,
shown below, using a thin shim to fill the void.

All repairs were glued, clamped, and set to cure for 48 hours.

REPARATION: LEG-to-CARCASS

Deep cuts under the body appeared to be original to the commode.
These were another weak link which we infilled with hard wood.

PAINT

Each color had to be matched.  The tricky part was imagining the color correctly after it dried.  Further, the topcoat had to be taken into account when mixing paints.

I save my mixing sheets in a notebook because while not all my mixes are correct for a project, they are good references for other possible paint colors.

Note from Kate:  The more I mix and am familiar with a specific medium, in this case oils, the better I am at coming to the correct color quickly.  Even so, I have tubes of rejected paints that didn’t make the cut.  I sometimes use them in other projects or in my own experiments in oil painting.

Mason Monterey’s Smokey Maple glaze
was a base of asphaltum diluted
with ®Galkyd, and this is the same
glaze, though more diluted,
used as a topcoat on the commode.

Once the colors were properly mixed
to the right recipe, they were made
in a large amounts and placed
in a tube.

The tops of the tubes were
colored with the oil paint in them.

Note from Kate: I am beginning to find that pigments are often associated with an era, and this commode is very close to the Mason Monterey palette. Even the blues, which are rarely shown in Monterey, is a good match to the Mason Blue.

Notes were taken of all the mixes, both on the mix sheets, and then in a notebook, shown above left.  On cardboard strips (close to the color of wood) the paints colors are also kept in a string of all project colors mixed, above right.

Below, the palette created during painting.  Original colors were sometimes tweaked slightly, and these too are shown next to the tube colors.

COMPLETION

Above the commode completed.

Above, details of the side before and after.

The top, above, before and after treatment; details shown below.

The interior of the door, before and after treatment.

 dkatiepowell@aol.com / mitchellrpowell@aol.com
503.970.2509 / 541.531.2383
©MPF Conservation.  May be printed for your own use.
Notify us if you repost, and use our url + copyright in reference.

Posted in antiques, conservation techniques, decorative motifs, French Furniture, Interim Report, painted furniture, painted objects, preservation, process, reparation, restoration techniques, upholstery, wooden objects | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Embellished Pillows

Several pillows were made to accompany our client’s family furniture after the design presentation:  below, images from the production process.  Pillows can make the look!   These pillows and bolsters are all hand-stitched other than the basic forms.

CYLINDER BOLSTER

The cylinder bolsters were created from
the striped silk used on the long
French Louis XVI Neoclassical Sofa circa 1760
shown above.  The two matching bolsters were
created to add comfort to the open wooden
arm ends and help make the long sofa more comfortable and inviting.

The stuffed form was created, and the silk wrapped the form and was hand-stitched.
Going through the embroidered areas required muscle and pliers to
push and pull the needle through the layers.

We also discovered an anomaly in the silk pattern, and this is discussed below in the video.  We had not checked the fabric for this aspect, as we’ve never had a good house have this kind of glitch, and unfortunately we had the last bit of fabric or we would have ordered more.  In any case, we had to use what we had as we could get no more of the silk.

Creating the ends, below.

Careful hand-stitching to gather the silk
on the bolster ends, above!

In all cases, trims needed to be kept from unraveling during the application.
A casein-based glue is added to the areas that are prone to unraveling, shown right.

One completed bolster, below.

RECTANGULAR RUST PILLOW

The rust shot silk taffeta was used in several pillows and cut all at once, shown left.  It was used as the back and the flange on several pillows.  This pillow incorporated the upholstery showcover from the two French Louis XIV Settees circa 1700, shown above.

Layers of passementerie one on top of another made these very difficult pillows to sew, especially as no forms could be used to stabilize the pillows as the forms would emboss the silk permanently.

Layers shown one on top of another in stills, above, and in the video, below.

If you love passementerie details, these pillows are beautiful, shown up close, last image above, and in the image below of the pillow top ready to be made into a pillow!

Note the beauty the layers of passementerie add in the
before and after of the pillow top, below.

SQUARE BEADED IVORY PILLOW

The ivory knotted eyelash silk taffeta made its way into several pillows, and the one below is the fanciest, using dangling beads all around.  Because of the layers, this one was pinned, then basted, for each layer of passementerie.

Notes are added to each process photo, below,
if you run your mouse over the image.

The top of the pillow completed, below, and ready to become a pillow!

Many pillow images,  below!

To see many images of sofas and loveseats, go here.
For pages on pillow ideas, go here.
To see our post on the design process, go here.

 dkatiepowell@aol.com / mitchellrpowell@aol.com
503.970.2509 / 541.531.2383
©MPF Conservation.  May be printed for your own use.
Notify us if you repost, and use our url + copyright in reference.

Posted in antiques, conservation techniques, decorative motifs, French Furniture, Interim Report, painted furniture, painted objects, preservation, process, reparation, restoration techniques, upholstery, wooden objects | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

CW Parker Carousel, Chariot Benches

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

(Swipe to see the cats discovering the pony!)

“Whoa… who put this here?” Savitri.
“Hey, there’s a critter in the studio!”  Gibbs…
“He’s not a cat….But he’s a cheery fella!  Just my size!”

It is a shame the C.W.Parker Carousel restoration was put on hold.
We have loads of information and hope to eventually share it with you.

Lions and tigers and bears and ponies!

Below are the benches that came into the studio for assessment
and eventually would have been properly conserved.
In all cases, we proposed going back to oil paint instead acrylic.
Oil is much more durable and has a beautiful depth to the paint.

SINGLE SEAT LION BENCH

Click the images to read the detailed comments under the images:

 

The Lion Bench (our name) has two giant lion heads on either side,
with flourishes of greenery, yellow flowers, and gold swirls.  It sits on a deep red base and is anchored at each end by a deep red flourish.

Unfortunately, at some point the seats themselves were ruined by
improper upholstery; no one in the days these were created would have done
such a shoddy job using foams.  The seats were stripped of their fiber pods,
and they were modified, as originally they would have been comfortable to sit on, extending another few inches forward.  One can imagine a thoroughly modern post-Victorian mother sitting on this delightful bench seat while keeping an eye on her children.

Now one has to Hang On to keep
from slipping off the front edge!

The case for upholstering the benches properly is simple:
foam will deteriorate faster than a traditional buildup, and as it does so
the showcover wears out faster.  If these benches are restored improperly again, they will cost more in the long run due to constant reupholsterings.

The carvings on both sides are in good condition but need repainting.


Jantzen Beach Lady going for a ride
on the single seat Lion Bench!

NATIVE AMERICAN HEAD
DOUBLE BENCH CHARIOT

Click the images to read the detailed comments under the images:

The Double Bench Chariot has copper wheels, a carved Native American head at the front, and angels at the back with pink wings.  Green flourishes and golden swirls decorate the sides.

We believe the opposite sides which faced the center of the carousel
were once carved like the front, and lost their carvings.
Our research says scenes were once painted on the outside back of the benches.
We believe in the restoration the scenes should be recreated, even if not historical, for the effect.  Of course, carving the opposite side would be grand, but if it is too expensive, perhaps painted images as an homage could take its place.

And as in the single bench, the upholstery was botched in the same way,
but can be brought back to a proper and comfortable seat!

We hope this project is eventually revived
and the carousel is treated properly!

To keep abreast of all our posts, follow us here or
on Instagram (@mpfconservation) or on Facebook!

 

Written by Kate Powell  ©MPF Conservation.
May be printed for your own use ONLY, not for use on blogs without permission.

Posted in antiques, art, conservation techniques, decorative motifs, Interim Report, painted furniture, painted objects, preservation, process, reparation, restoration techniques, upholstery, wooden objects | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

“Jerry Lamb” Wingback Ca. 2010

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Our client purchased the wingback chair designed by Jerry Lamb, a Portland Oregon antique dealer and interior designer.

We were to do a full restoration, down to the frame, with a goal of improving upon its comfort level.  We also were to use both traditional and modern methods in the execution of its upholstery buildup.

Therefore, this chair is an upholstery hybrid.

We changed the showcover to a lively colorful dragon motif trapunto from Kravet.

While waiting for restoration, it was a frequent favorite of the studio cats; Savitri shown in a regal pose, above right.  BTW, our cats submit to nail clippings every Wednesday evening, and before our cats are allowed around upholstery projects we make sure our clients have no allergies; ours have cats.

EXCAVATION

Above, we began our excavation by turning the chair upside down and removing the old dustcover, exposing the webbing.  Furniture is excavated in the reverse order it was upholstered.

Two items were found under the dustcover; we do not know their significance.

As we removed the outside back, two items were noted.

The previous upholsterer used ®Ply-grip on the contoured edges instead of hand-stitching; we will hand-stitch the back into place.

Also, fabric remnants were used as dustmembranes.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Excavation images, above.  Right, a detail of the original stuffing buildup (all prefabricated materials) when we first loosened the front seat apron, revealing the layers of synthetic buildup for the first time.

Mitchell took images and notes of what was used and how the original buildup was performed.

FINISH

The alder legs were quite chingered, examples in the first two images above.

We scuffed the original finish (third and fourth images).

Mitchell created a shellac infused with a dye to balance the losses without changing the nature of the intended finish choice, which was a semi-transparent stain.  The final coats were a platina shellac.

Leg after finish process, final image above.

SPRING-UP

The chair frame is repaired and ready to begin the buildup, above right.

In all cases throughout the project, we repaired tack and other holes
as necessary using hard picks and PVA glue or hide glue.

Turning the chair over, we began with new 11 lb jute webbing, above, basket-woven and tacked into the underside of the frame.

The chair was turned over, left, for the seat buildup.

In the images above, the springs are set in before the tie-down for design consideration.  We replaced the front springs, using a taller, and higher gauge spring than the original.  We wanted the center of gravity to drop back and in, rather than slipping forward and out, as it did previously.

We reused the rear original seat springs.

Mitchell used a double four-way tie using linen waxed spring twine, steps shown above:

  • Lashed springs to the seat webbing using linen twine;
  • Tie vertical springs;
  • Tie horizontal springs.

Shown right, the springs from underneath,  tied to the webbing.

The hessian spring topper was tacked to the frame.  Because the chair is a modern chair, we used manufactured edgeroll as might have been used in a good upholstery project from this period. Note the positioning of the seat edgeroll cantilevered in order to achieve more significant depth in the seat.

The hessian was stitched using a Holbein Stitch.

No springs were used previously in the inside back.

We set light gauge coil spring into the inside back in order to establish comfort.

Because of the exaggerated hourglass shape of the inside back, it was not possible to set an additional line of coil springs into the extremities, therefore, light gauge cushion springs were adapted to fill the voids of the contours in the extremities.

Additionally, a prefabricate jute-filled thick edgeroll was secured to the extremities in order to fill the excessive voids inherent in the hourglass-shaped design.

Below, a hessian spring topper covers the springs, then is secured to the hessian using a Holbien stitch.

 

PATTERNS

Patterns were taken at intervals along the process.

Patterns shown below for cutting the pincore latex.

Note the stretchers glued to the latex to be used as pulls, last image below.

BUILDUP

Layers of seat buildup, above:

  • coir, lashed into place around edges;
  • center of organic cotton;
  • hair added and stitched into place overlapping the coir edge;
  • topper of pincore latex;
  • front contour of cotton;
  • layer of white cotton muslin.

The chair was set onto its back, left, for buildup on the inside back, below.

As with the seat:

  • coir is again lashed into place around edges;
  • center of organic cotton to ensure the lumbar and dorsal spine can drop into a more comfortable position;
  • hair added and stitched across the intire inside back;
  • topper of pincore latex;
  • cotton topper;
  • layer of white cotton muslin.

Each inside arm was built as follows:

  • A foundational layer of jute webbing and hessian topper attached to the frame;
  • A roll of teased coir was lashed to the hessian;
  • A latex rubber slab was installed along the arm top frame as a filler to rectify disparate elevations and ensure elbow comfort;
  • A jute-filled hessian-covered prefabricated edgeroll was attached to the front arm contour;
  • A tracing was taken of the armfront on a transparency to be used for both the muslin ticking and the showcover;
  • A sheet of pincore latex was added;
  • A layer of needled cotton batting was placed on the contoured arm front;
  • A layer of staple cotton was placed over the top of the entire arm;
  • and prior to the showcover a cotton muslin ticking protected the internals.

FINALLY, THE SHOWCOVER IS APPLIED!

The Tibetan inspired Dragon trapunto from Kravet, shown above, sits in a staggered “grid” of roughly 18-inches apart in a field of Tibetan-inspired clouds with sprinklings of organic floral/leaf patterns.   To place this pattern on an undulating frame form as the showcover was a challenge.

Three things Mitchell kept in mind when placing the Dragon motif:

  1. To ensure elevation balance, easily seen in the front apron, right;
  2. To create what appeared a natural flow for the motif over the components of the chair; and
  3. To ensure the centralized motif of the Dragon was featured whenever possible and artistically balanced.

We also thought about the motif patterns the person sitting might see around them on the chair, versus the person sitting across from the chair or approaching the chair.

Yaman oversees and makes the deciding calls on placement, above left.  Little shop panthers know everything!

We began with the seat.  A topper of cotton batting, right, is always laid between the muslin topper and the showcover on all parts for the longevity of the showcover fabric.

 

The showcover pattern was cut for the seat to cascade down the front apron and wrap the corners, laying the Dragon in the center of the front and on each corner, shown above.  On the seat itself are two Dragons flanking the sides, and this will play into the arms later on in the process.

The showcover fabric was cut for the inside and outside back, shown below, and the side arms.  The cut showcover fabric was overcast, above right.

Stretchers were placed on each of the various pattern parts, example above right.

Edging was cut from orange silk velvet Scalamandre Colony fabric, shown right, and sewn around 10/32 cotton cording.

Transparent patterns were taken off each arm, above.

As with each part, the showcover pattern was cut from the arm pattern, pinned and hand-stitched onto the front, images one and two above.  Care was taken to center a Dragon on the top of each arm so that it is seen when a person is sitting in the chair, shown below.

The orange cording was placed, pinned and hand-stitched to the front, image three above.

The showcover for the body of the arm was cut, pinned into place, and hand-stitched then pulled through using stretchers just to the point where the trapunto still had loft and body but laid properly.

Left, the right-facing arm completed.

Note:  These steps were used for each part of the chair’s body, shown below.  The parts were not shown in true order, as it was not just a matter of doing this part then that part, as they were intertwined.  For the sake of simplicity, we will show the parts as if they were done in one layered process.

Chair inside back, above.

The steps of the inside of each wing shown above.

The front apron is built with additional cotton batting, above and right.

The steps of the outside of each wing, shown above.

The outside back, above. Final edging hand-stitched, right.

The chair is finally flipped over to add the dustcover to the bottom, above.

The chair is completed, right and below.

After treatment, from overhead, above.

A few images of the chair after treatment above.

A 360-degree view slideshow, below, plus a cascade of details which allow you to see the superior pattern matching care Mitchell takes in our upholstery projects, one of which is shown right.  Note the Dragon’s foot on the outside back which is an extension of the side panel!

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Details, below.

A slideshow of the entire process from start to completion, below.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

 

 dkatiepowell@aol.com / mitchellrpowell@aol.com
503.970.2509 / 541.531.2383
©MPF Conservation.  May be printed for your own use.
Notify us if you repost, and use our url + copyright in reference.

Posted in antiques, chair, conservation techniques, decorative motifs, Interim Report, preservation, process, reparation, restoration techniques, upholstery | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Hunzinger “Lollipop” Chair, 4 Upholstery

Our armchair, affectionately known as the “lollipop” chair, was made circa 1880.  George Jakob Hunzinger (born 1835 in Tuttingen, Germany), was a progressive designer out of New York who was often influenced in his designs by machinery; their geometry and patterns of repetition in their elements.   This is a Hunzinger original, a family piece, which has weathered more than a century of continuous use.

Note:  Mitchell muses about the process in several areas; these parts are italicized.

To begin, go to:
Hunzinger “Lollipop” Chair, 1 Excavation;
Huntzinger “Lillipop” Chair, 2 Frame Reparation;
Hunzinger “Lollipop” Chair, 3 Finish.

This is the last post on the Hunzinger “Lollipop” Chair, 4 Upholstery.

Our finish treatment was completed on the frame right, in our last post.

REUPHOLSTERY: OVERVIEW

Hunzinger’s original design allowed for the convenience of crafting the upholstery without the burden of working around the fixed points of the inside-back and interior arm frame. Unfortunately, the damage caused by previous unskilled repairs ended all possibility of recrafting the traditional upholstery with the decorative spindled back unit separated from the seat.  MPFC had to devise strategies to make it possible to perform all the steps required during a traditional upholstery build-up.

Ultimately, after restoring the fiber filled seat pod, it was still challenging to easily tack the show-cover onto the side rails using traditional means (tack hammer and tacks) and so it was decided to secure the leather show-cover to the restored tacking margins using wide chisel pointed upholstery staples shot from a long nosed stapler.

Relative to this upholstery conservation/restoration project our decision was to make certain that the seat build-up could perform as it was originally intended while at the same time preserving/encasing the levels of the original stuffings within the restored set and in that way future generations, when uncovering the seat internals, can see and identify the historic pod.  To that end we begin the documentation of the phase of this multi pronged conservation effort. We will begin with:

THE HISTORIC FIBER POD

The historic seat pod was cleaned of dirt and debris using a vacuum  with the suction level set low. To insure large particles and artifacts did not slip through during vacuuming cheese cloth was attached to the  extraction wand.  The cleaned fiber pod was set aside for re-installation, during the upholstery phase,  after the frame and finish issues were treated and resolved. (below).

THE SECONDARY STUFFING & FIBER POD TOPPER

The  seat hair and cotton batting secondary build-up (above) were inspected after vacuuming.  It was decided that the two levels of cotton batting, each representing different times when the seat was reupholstered, were far too damaged to be used as future pod toppers, but the horse mane pod secondary topper could be hand blocked and teased then amended with fresh horsehair when it was reinstalled.

THE NEW SEAT SPRING WEBBING FOUNDATION

Fresh four inch wide jute webbing was applied in the same configuration and position as the original webbing. We were able to establish the original width and position of the spring webbing during the woodworking restoration phase.

MPFC has created a tack and previous repair plotting system which we use on historic objects which maps and delineates the succession  of upholstery, in this case. We plotted the tacking positions using clear sheet vinyl over the tacking margins both seat top and bottom.  We identified all tack holes by identifying their positions using various colors of a Sharpie marker set upon the surface of a heavy mill clear vinyl.  When the vinyl was removed from the tacking surfaces and set onto a white board the transparency allowed us to not only discern the positions of foundational and show cover tacks, but also to detect patterns in the tacking groupings which then allowed us to interpret the patterns as positions and width of webbing and clear understanding as to how many upholsterings had taken place.

Additional data gleaned from the tacking surfaces were the style of tacks and fiber trapped beneath the tacks. This allowed us to determine the time frames when the chair was originally upholstered, reupholstered, and what types of show covers had been installed.

The original positioning and width of the tacking pattern also allowed us to determine what the original designer and upholsterer intended relative to the sit of the sprung-up seat, which also determined the intended center of seating gravity and the intended comfort level of the sit.

THE FRESH SPRING-UP AND WEBBING LASHINGS

Seat springs were temporarily clinched into into place over the webbing prior to lashing the springs to the webbing. Once the springs were lashed with twine to the webbing the metal clinches were removed.

Mitchell decided to use a “Number 4” configuration with his lashings, departing from the Holbein configuration.

TYING OF THE HISTORIC,  SECOND GENERATION, COIL SEAT SPRINGS

An eight-way double course spring tie was utilized to achieve a stable seat. The second generation springs were reused in spite of their slight distortion from years of listing within the degrading seat primarily because they were of a light gauge no longer available in the height and diameter required for the modest seat footprint. Therefore, the spring-tie we chose included double knotted and overlapping courses of twines around all edge springs forming fulcrums to insure the old springs could not revert to their previous distortions.

THE FIRST SEAT BUILD-UP “First Stuffing”

The tied coil springs were covered with a doubled layer of hessian which was tacked to the retrofitted interior frame aprons.  The springs were lashed to the hessian in a Holbein pattern using a waxed linen cord.  Teased polished coir was lashed to the perimeter of the seat edge using bridal stitches in order to amend and rectify lost loft and compression in the original worn fiber pod.  The cleaned historic fiber pod made of flax tow was hand blocked then placed over the amended seat deck and gently lashed into position around the interior seat perimeter.

The original horsehair second stuffing was hand blocked and set over the historic pod then attached with a running stitch.

To encase the historic pod within the restored seat a final layer of fresh hessian was then stretched over the historic pod, edges under turned and tacked to the retrofitted tacking margins.  A simple lashing was chosen to duplicate the original pod stitching with a simple perimeter roll and a finger stitched edge-roll which transited the front edge.

THE SECOND SEAT BUILD-UP “Second Stuffing”

A fresh layer of horse-hair was teased out on the restored pod then set under the bridal stitching.

The hair was then covered with a half thick layer of organic 50/50 cotton batting. Finally the second stuffing was encased beneath a 400ct cotton percale sheeting muslin, left, then tacked to the conserved tacking margins.

The seat was then ready for the final show-cover upholstery.

THE SHOW -COVER

A “pull-up” style aniline dyed two part colored hide with a waxed surface was chosen to mimic hides from the chair’s decorative period. A grain structure within the hide was chosen to reflect longevity and aesthetic appeal; the leather was cut, image #1 above.

A light layer of organic cotton batting was placed over the percale muslin to act as additional loft and create a buffer between the cloth and the back of the leather, image #2.

 

The leather was uniformly tacked to the restored tacking margins, above.  A straight vertical pleat was chosen to install at the two front edge corners to reflect the typical single vertical pleating from the chairs decorative period. A thin coating of colored shellac was brush coated to the overlapping muslin to leather tacking edge (no image) in order to assure that any bleed or distortions to the upper leather decorative tape could not reveal materials beneath the tape.

A single line of leather was cut and skived to conform to the tacking edges and aged brass decorative nails were installed through the leather tape and into the tacking margin.

THE DUST COVER

Finally, a medium weight polished cotton twill was tacked to the conserved frame underside and the upholstery phase of the chair’s restoration was complete.

The Lollipop Chair is Complete!

 

A Slideshow of the Chair Restoration and Upholstering:

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

dkatiepowell@aol.com / mitchellrpowell@aol.com
503.970.2509 / 541.531.2383
©MPF Conservation.  May be printed for your own use.
Notify us if you repost, and use our url + copyright in reference.

Posted in antiques, art, chair, conservation techniques, decorative motifs, Interim Report, preservation, process, reparation, restoration techniques, upholstery, wooden objects | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Hunzinger “Lollipop” Chair, 3 Finish

Our armchair, affectionately known as the “lollipop” chair, was made circa 1880.  George Jakob Hunzinger (born 1835 in Tuttingen, Germany), was a progressive designer out of New York who was often influenced in his designs by machinery; their geometry and patterns of repetition in their elements.   This is a Hunzinger original, a family piece, which has weathered more than a century of continuous use.

Note:  Mitchell muses about the process in several areas; these parts are italicized.

To begin, go to Hunzinger “Lollipop” Chair, 1 Excavation;
Huntzinger “Lillipop” Chair, 2 Frame Reparation;
This is Hunzinger “Lollipop” Chair, 3 Finish, of 4 parts.

The chair before finish treatment, below right.  We performed a modified “mechado” treatment to preserve and revive the historic finish.

HISTORIC FINISH OVERVIEW

Mechado” in this case refers to a blending of compatible materials as well as a technique for preservation and restoration. Our intent is to preserve and revive the historic coating using a layering approach which when thoughtfully applied, in a circumspect order, will not only bind to the historic coating but also become an amalgam (combine as one) with the historic coating. Our layering “Mechado” approach is described below. 

VARNISH FORMULA COATING APPLICATION

The original finish was shellac varnish over asphaltum oil glaze.  It  was thoroughly cleaned using VM&P Naptha.  Once the cleaning distillate had thoroughly evaporated the surfaces were gently skip sanded using a wet/dry lightly abrasive paper,  concentrating upon areas of odd accretions and losses in varnish elevation. The surfaces were again treated to a wipe-down using Naptha then set aside for 24 hours to completely evaporate.

MPFC creates our own shellac which are true to original formulas, occasionally choosing to infuse the shellac with compatible tree resins which will add either stretch, or hardness, or both to the coating.  For this chair’s base varnish we chose a blended shellac and tree resin varnish which we prepared, in-house, from a traditional recipe. The varnish was chosen for its ability to balance hardness with flexibility.  Lab grade isopropyl alcohol was decanted into a wide-mouth glass jar while mixing into the distillate fresh beige toned shellac flakes, copal resin and larch sap turpentine.  These ingredients dissolved over the day and rendered a brush-able 1lb-cut solution of varnish.  The fresh varnish was then brush applied to all surfaces, melding with the historic varnish and sealing the damaged varnish surfaces. The fresh shellac coating produced a reliable foundation for amending the damaged historic surfaces with blended waxes and resins after we performed selective infills into losses.

We allowed this coating to cure for several days.

TOUCH-UP AND COLOR INFILL

In order to blend distressed areas of color losses from careless usage and indiscriminate wear, MPFC created a “repair” spirit-varnish (shellac varnish infused with earth based pigments which would infuse into shellac while remaining transparent and non-textural).  This maintained a viscosity which could be manipulated with artist brushes in order to blend into historic surrounds.  Once the infill varnish was satisfactorily applied we waited a day for the material to fix to surfaces, then we re-coated those areas of touch-up with the primary varnish in order to seal the pigments  prior of the wax applications.

Hard carnauba wax infused with a small percentage earth based pigment, bees wax and tree resin was melted into our specialized applicator, then drizzled into areas of loss. Once the hot wax fills cooled they were selectively contoured then leveled to match surround.

Finally, a warmed wax slurry was applied over the varnished surfaces before the varnish had the opportunity to harden to the point of rejecting the wax infusion. As the wax solution spread over the surfaces they were assisted in flow by using over-large artist brushes which were dipped into odorless mineral spirits.

Once the surfaces would no longer absorb wax the finished elements were both buffed with soft brushes and rubbed with cotton diaper cloth and woolen rag.

The final polish was turned into a semi-gloss patina which allowed for normal wear anomalies to assert themselves visually while giving off a rich, well appointed and historically accurate patina.

Our next post is Upholstery to complete!
Hunzinger “Lollipop” Chair, 4 Upholstery

Written by Kate Powell  ©MPF Conservation.
May be printed for your own use ONLY, not for use on blogs without permission.

Posted in antiques, art, chair, conservation techniques, decorative motifs, Interim Report, preservation, process, reparation, restoration techniques, upholstery, wooden objects | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment